by Jem Smith » 06 Jan 2025, 01:35
Yep. It's even worse that they weren't the powered kind, they were hand cranked.
It came out of an attitude of prioritising the baby's health at any cost to the mother. Women could survive it, but with lifelong health issues, and it's kind of messed that this was done sometimes without the woman's consent. There are other ways to get out a baby that's stuck without cutting through bones.
--- 06 Jan 2025, 11:36 ---
Netherrealmer wrote:And if you think about it, there's no anesthesia back then. Someone holds the hands and feet of the patient so they cannot move.no anesthetic and chainsaw. So happy Im a man
There was anestethesia then (opiates, twilight sleep, even just alcohol would be better than nothing)- at least, it existed, although these women probably didn't get any.
to help the widening of the pubic cartilage and removal of disease-laden bone during childbirth
No, the "removal of disease-laden bone" is a separate thing, for cases of things like infection and bone cancer, not something done during childbirth. It childbirth it was just to widen the pelvis.
It's not just a thing from long ago either. There are women still living now who experienced it.There was an advocacy group called Survivors of Symphysiotomy (SoS) set up in Ireland in 2002 "alleging religiously motivated symphysiotomies were performed without consent and against best medical practice in Republic of Ireland between 1944 and 1987".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphysiotomy_controversy_in_Ireland
Yep. It's even worse that they weren't the powered kind, they were hand cranked.
It came out of an attitude of prioritising the baby's health at any cost to the mother. Women could survive it, but with lifelong health issues, and it's kind of messed that this was done sometimes without the woman's consent. There are other ways to get out a baby that's stuck without cutting through bones.
--- 06 Jan 2025, 11:36 ---
[quote="Netherrealmer"]And if you think about it, there's no anesthesia back then. Someone holds the hands and feet of the patient so they cannot move.no anesthetic and chainsaw. So happy Im a man[/quote]
There was anestethesia then (opiates, twilight sleep, even just alcohol would be better than nothing)- at least, it existed, although these women probably didn't get any.
[quote] to help the widening of the pubic cartilage and removal of disease-laden bone during childbirth[/quote]
No, the "removal of disease-laden bone" is a separate thing, for cases of things like infection and bone cancer, not something done during childbirth. It childbirth it was just to widen the pelvis.
[b]It's not just a thing from long ago either. There are women still living now who experienced it.[/b]
There was an advocacy group called Survivors of Symphysiotomy (SoS) set up in Ireland in 2002 "alleging religiously motivated symphysiotomies were performed without consent and against best medical practice in Republic of Ireland between 1944 and 1987".
[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphysiotomy_controversy_in_Ireland[/url]