spiderdust wrote:It's more of a business transaction than a relationship, but I guess that's what marriage was originally too.
cmoneyspinner wrote:spiderdust wrote:It's more of a business transaction than a relationship, but I guess that's what marriage was originally too.
No. That's not what marriage was "originally". It was meant to be a relationship based on selfless love, where a home could be built. But as humanity became more and more "civilized" customs and traditions like a bride dowry crept in. Now people talk about prenuptial agreements and stuff like before they get married, as if they're expecting a break-up!
Presh wrote:No need to deceive ourselves that we marry for love
Its not wrong if you are both single and adults. There is no religion that bans consenting adults from getting married.Fidelia wrote:This is something that I can't find myself doing. I find it morally wrong to have an affair with a way older person. It is just my personal conviction.
Netherrealmer wrote:Its not wrong if you are both single and adults. There is no religion that bans consenting adults from getting married.
There is a point you get to in life where people's opinions should be they'll leasy of your concerns. People have different priorities in life and if financial security is one's priority in choosing a spouse, so be it. They shouldn't be shamed for that.cmoneyspinner wrote:Netherrealmer wrote:Its not wrong if you are both single and adults. There is no religion that bans consenting adults from getting married.
I agree. So what if people "on the outside" call your mate "sugar momma" or "sugar daddy" and call you a "golddigger"? What? Rich people can't do what they want with their own money?
For as long as she got hot huge hooters, you are available you mean? Hahaha, that is interesting.MysticMoons wrote:i would marry a sugar mom but she has to be hot with huge hooters
that is what makes it sweet for the deal
Return to Business, Money & Wealth - BMW Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests