cmoneyspinner wrote:Baldwin was fully responsible for overseeing everything and ensuring the safety of his employees.
Was Baldwin main director? If he is not why he is blamed. Main director should control everything and be responsabile.
cmoneyspinner wrote:Baldwin was fully responsible for overseeing everything and ensuring the safety of his employees.
mrki444 wrote:cmoneyspinner wrote:Baldwin was fully responsible for overseeing everything and ensuring the safety of his employees.
Was Baldwin main director? If he is not why he is blamed. Main director should control everything and be responsabile.
Fidelia wrote:You are not the only one. The husband is likely an opportunist that sees the incident as an easy pathway to become rich.cmoneyspinner wrote:Tiern wrote:How much percentage of the box office revenue did the husband get? And how is he even sure the movie would do well commercially? Wouldn't he have gotten compensation if they had gone ahead with the case?
I guess I'm not the only one who is suspicious of the husband. I didn't say this, but I was thinking it.
if he sued, the case could take 10 years or more. I guess he rather earn the money for their kids.Tiern wrote:The husband obviously didn't have her killed. But he is ready to cash out the easier way from the death of his wife instead of the longer path.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 4 guests